Constantine

 

I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but there have been a lot of comic book movies out there recently. Let’s call it a subtle trend. What’s interesting to me is that only by seeing the trailer — or sometimes, by hearing the casting details — you can usually tell which of two categories they fall into. These categories are, of course:

  1. Awesome and exciting.
  2. Cheap and shitty.

With hindsight of course, it’s easy to classify them, but just for fun: Catwoman — Crap. Spiderman 2 — Good. Elektra — Crap. Batman Begins — Good. Well, probably.

Constantine however, was a movie that I really wasn’t sure about. The trailer was a mixture of good and evil.[ftn] Some cool effects and set pieces, but some very slow-looking dialogue, and a painful aura of seriousness. Going to see it was a bit of a gamble. And for most people, it hasn’t paid off. Most people in my cinema were laughing at the serious bits, and guffawing at every plot development. A lot of the reviews I’ve seen online are quite damning. And fans of the comic book Hellblazer on which the film is based don’t seem particularly thrilled.

And yet — I kind of liked it. I mean, if you want to scorn this film, I’m sure you could. And yet for some reason, I was drawn in. I’ll try to explain why for the rest of the review.

Perhaps it’s the setting. Constantine has a fabulous, catholic-esque[ftn] universe to explore. John Constantine is a cynical shell of a man, wandering around a world he’d never have believed in if he hadn’t seen it. The film establishes some solid rules for all the angels and demons wandering about, and sticks to them. Constantine is given a bunch of anti-demon gadgets by his Q-equivalent, and they all get used.[ftn]

But then, you might find Christian mythology very hard to take seriously, and find shotguns with crucifixes lame and not cool. It’s possible that Keanu’s po-faced explanations of all the stuff going on might irritate rather than enthrall. It depends how believable you find Keanu.

There’s a lot of other interesting characters, too; a fat, alcoholic priest, a nervous, bookish fellow who lives behind a bowling alley and just manages to avoid being a cliché, the kind of androgynous angel Gabriel, and the lovely Rachel Weisz. Miss Weisz does a pretty decent turn as a tormented cop having her eyes opened to a bizarre new universe — reminding me a lot of Elizabeth Rohm in the first season of Angel. She’s perhaps just a shade too sensible at times; I find just a touch of “this is all a bit silly, isn’t it” works rather well in this sort of movie.

Of course, you might think the acting’s all really lame. I’m just not sure.

John Constantine himself, however, is my favourite thing about the film. I’m sick of heroes that are completely incompetent until just near the end of the final act. I’m sick of heroes who claim to have only the most pure and noble of intentions, yet get all the ancilliary benefits (girls, souls, whatever) at the end of the film anyhow. I’m sick of heroes who don’t really have much of a plan, charge in, and win because of pure luck rather than improvisational skill. John comes across as a clever guy, who knows which battles he can win, and which he can’t. He’ll break the rules if he has to, but at the same time, he’ll use them to his advantage. And he doesn’t warn bad guys before he attacks them. He’s pretty sensible.[ftn]

Keanu plays Constantine with his usual understatement, but like Hugh Grant, he’s an actor who knows his strengths and limitations and steps so deftly within them that he actually ends up performing quite impressively. He can walk sombrely in a trenchcoat pretty well, and take the piss out of it when necessary, too.[ftn] I’m aware that there’s people out there who hate Keanu. You folk won’t like this movie, I’m pretty sure. You can take your place with all the Hellblazer fans who can’t accept a brown-haired American playing a blond Brit.

I really enjoyed this film. There’s adventure, there’s jokes, there’s a lot of subversion of expectation, there’s an awesome bit with a shotgun, and the finale is clever, amusing, and dramatic. You’ll only hate it if you’re the sort of person who gets too self-conscious watching things like Buffy the Vampire Slayer.[ftn]

Footnotes

  1. Like everything man touches.
  2. Never will I stop making up dumb words.
  3. Yes, even the car with the rocket launchers. Oh, alright, there isn’t one.
  4. Actually, he kind of reminds me of Angel. The vampire, that is, not a catholic angel. Sorry for confusing the issue.
  5. I particularly liked the chewing gum.
  6. Or Doctor Who. 17 days…
796

12 Responses to “Constantine”

  1. actually im going to agree with your point at numer 4. i found Angel was a multiple offender for rushing in without thinking and then winning in a below par fight scene when her really shouldnt. I cant actually think of scene to back me up here but i remember it happening regually.

  2. Do you mean disagree? I suppose John only reminds me of Angel in the sense of the brooding, and the lack of explanations, and the efficient action.

    Angel wasn’t as bad as Buffy in that respect, I seem to recall. In Angel’s case it was almost justified, because he could pretty much beat anyone.

    Still, there was that time he tried to take on a nasty demon when he’d become a human, with no plan whatsoever. That was pretty dumb.

  3. So Tom wants me to type stuff, well, I may actually use this to say something unimportant.I don’t like Angel, nor do I like Buffy. And no Constantine doesn’t remind me of either, except that he seems like a lowlife. I could do so much fun stuff with powers like his. ;)

  4. I’m sorry for making you type things that you didn’t want to, Hayko…

    There’s supposed to be a live comment preview going on above the box, as you type — can anyone else see it, or is it just me?

  5. Drop the hallucinogens, Tom. There ain’t even nothing.Actually, in IE it works. Is that really what you desire?

  6. yah Hayko. i agree with you. although, one point. i dont think Constantine actually had any powers. i think he was a regular human.and in my first point i did mean to write “disagre”.

  7. Interesting. It works in my Firefox. And Safari. I wonder what the difference is between our Foxes. I’m using one of the nightly builds.

    I agree with Matt. I didn’t spot Constantine having any special powers. Regarding any similarities the movie had to Angel — well, I’m used to seeing things that other people don’t. Perhaps I should go back on the meds.

  8. This live comments thingy is pretty fun.

  9. It doesn’t work on my firefox but good ol’ IE is fine.

  10. It is fun, isn’t it? Not so useful, but lots of fun. Anyhow, it doesn’t work in Firefox 1.0, but it does work in the nightly builds. I’m using one of those currently and they’re pretty stable. You can get them at The Burning Edge.

    I’m not sure what has changed. Anyhow, that Constantine film, huh? I’ve read some absolutely scathing reviews.

  11. I didn’t mind Constantine.

    I thought it was good and I enjoyed it a lot.

    But it wasn’t your typical movie… if I hadn’t been expecting it to be good, I doubt I would have liked it at all.

    Odd that. It usually works the other way.

  12. That’s a good point. I was going in to enjoy it as well, I’d say.

    There were a lot of people in our audience who weren’t into it at all! Which was irritating.