Dawn of the Dead
I’ll just come out and say that as a self-appointed zombie expert it shames me to admit that I haven’t seen the original of the Dead trilogy. I know your faith in me is shaken. I aim to rectify this deficiency; rest assured that I have increased my anti-zombie training to 4 hours a day. I decided to watch the recent remake first as remakes are usually worse than the originals[ftn] and I prefer to go from bad to good. Unfortunately Resident Evil 4 has been delayed again and won’t be out until next year, and Resident Evil Outbreak is PS2 only but Shawn of the Dead and Resident Evil: Apocalypse are being released soon so I should be able to keep my training on schedule.
This film opened my eyes to a couple of home truths. For one thing, I shouldn’t assume that zombies are slow moving. Apparently some of them can run really fast.
Another thing: God bless America. They truly are safe.[ftn] When the zombies attack, they just run to the gun store and stock up. What would we do in Australia? No semi-automatic weapons, no oversized military packed to the gills with high explosives. When the dragons awake to reclaim the earth, we’ll have half a dozen choppers to hold them back. America recently decided to let ordinary citizens wield automatic weapons. What progress! What forward thinking! Iraq will be safe too. I pity us poor schmucks here in Oz.[ftn]
This film turned out to be pretty good in the end. The special effects were good, definitely above B-grade standard and there was some decent characters. It’s a fairly standard zombie movie. For no real reason, some people wake up as zombies one morning. They want to feast on human flesh. There’s a group of people holed up somewhere. They decide to leave their safe haven and go on a wacky road trip. They have to kill their loved ones who have come back in zombie form. They make some stupid decisions and they fight amongst themselves. No one wears protective clothing. There’s self-sacrifice. Things go horribly horribly wrong. There’s hot pregnant zombie action.
It’s the little differences that make a zombie movie. The light hearted scenes in the middle were a nice touch. Once the group was established in the mall they were able to relax and enjoy things. These scenes break up the tension nicely. There was a funny scene standing in the elevator listening to the cheery music while running from the zombies.
It was a curious choice not use the word zombie in the film. Most horror films usually have a character early on call the creatures zombies or vampires and everyone says things like ‘zombies aren’t real, maybe he’s just let himself go’ until they actually see zombies climbing out of their graves. Here they do mention that people have come back from the dead but no one says zombie. I liked it at first but it seemed odd after a while.
There was some interesting stuff on how people react to a zombie epidemic. It was subtle and more believable than other movies. The suspicious mall security guards tried to keep people from looting the shops. Dr Pratt refuses to kill his zombie baby.[ftn] No one knows what to do with someone who has been bitten but only has a minor wound and isn’t going to die for a while.
I liked the style of the ending. I thought the film was going to end without the final fate of the characters known but it continued on into the credits showing what one of the characters was filming with a video camera. That way it felt like the rest of the adventure was shown while being cleverly compressed to fit into a decent length film.
Dawn of the Dead is a good film, especially for a remake. It’s a lot more consistent than 28 Days Later which started out good but finished badly. There’s a couple of plot holes in the movie: I don’t know why the guy was waving a chainsaw around in a moving vehicle and they should seriously wear some protection against zombie bites.
I have to go build myself a bomb shelter now. I’ll need about 6 months supply of food and water. That should be along enough time for the zombies to decay.
DVD Review
The DVD some clever extras. Instead of the usual deleted scenes, there’s background footage about the zombie plague. There’s a recording of what happened to the guy over the road from the mall and the news reports from the day of the zombie attacks. There’s also the usual commentary and behind the scenes stuff, most of which focus on how to make zombies’ heads explode convincingly. A worthy goal in my opinion.
Footnotes
- e.g. Planet of the Apes, Psycho and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.
- Except in the case of natural disasters. They seem to be targeted unfairly. Australia was untouched in The Day After Tomorrow.
- Now that I think about it, Australia has no zombie attacks. I’d rather be in a country that has no guns and no zombie attacks. Yay for quarantine.[ftn]
- I knew he was up to no good.
- John Howard is a hero for keeping out those refugees. Any one of them could have been carrying a zombie plague.
Tom
October 20th, 2004 at 12:19 am
If you haven’t seen the original Of the Dead movies then you’re officially sacked as NTGF’s resident zombie expert. Next time the apocalypse comes, we’ll fight the forces of darkness on our own.
Tom
October 21st, 2004 at 12:41 am
By the way, Shannon, if you’re reading this — how do you like the links?
Andy
October 21st, 2004 at 12:58 am
Subtle. To prevent me using another footnote ploy, you’ve linked them up. You think that will stop me? It won’t. I’ll get you when you least expect it: while you’re reading a grapefruit article. Which is when you would expect it. So watch out!
Tom
October 21st, 2004 at 5:46 pm
I’m terrified. I won’t be able to browse easy again.
Shannon
October 23rd, 2004 at 12:19 am
Yes, I’m very pleased with the links, Tom. Thank you very much. I shall start reading grapefruits articles again now that this controversy has been cleared up.
Tom
October 23rd, 2004 at 2:30 am
It’s been a divisive time for all of us, but I feel now we can move past our differences, and into a time of healing.
Andy
October 23rd, 2004 at 12:38 pm
Not me. I’m still habouring guilt and resentment. I’ll squash them down into ball of hatred and save it to use later.
Shannon
October 23rd, 2004 at 10:58 pm
Always a handy thing to have in stock, the good old ball of hatred. Never know when one will be useful.
hayko
November 4th, 2004 at 4:33 am
Ah, what are you talking about?
What is wrong with you people in trying to find sense in a horror / zombie movie? Why not just go for some senseless fighting?And the guy used the chainsaw to chop off the zombies, when driving over a speed bump (or zombie) he was shaken and thrown around the truck. Obviously he forgot to switch off the chainsaw.
And shame on you for the lack of the originals, at least I saw one of them. Trick is, the remake isn’t meant to be fun, really. Shawn of the dead however. hehe hehe
Tom
November 4th, 2004 at 8:10 am
Actually, I think you’re the first person to even talk about the film in these comments, Hayko!
I certainly won’t be seeing it. Senseless fighting just doesn’t do it for me.
Andy
November 4th, 2004 at 11:45 am
This conversation was going fine until you turned up Hayko. I guess the chainsaw in the truck bit does make sense. It just caught me by surprise that bit. I wouldn’t let someone so careless in my truck. And I do like senseless fighting. I’ve seen Brain Dead
If you only watch one zombie movie this year Tom, watch Shawn of the Dead.
hayko
November 6th, 2004 at 6:39 am
That was a generic approach. Why watch Terminator 3? Certainly not for the intense character development or the new insightful interpersonal (-machinable) conflict resolution (i.e. man vs machine).
Oh so lovely to bash a horror movie for doing what its genre asks of it.
Tom
November 6th, 2004 at 5:43 pm
Who’s bashing? I wouldn’t watch Terminator 3. If I criticise something that’s an implicit part of the genre, then I guess I’m criticising the genre.
hayko
November 7th, 2004 at 4:02 am
Your loss, not to watch T3. ;)What’s wrong with the genre?
PS: I like what you’ve done with the comments form. =)
Tom
November 7th, 2004 at 4:23 am
Are we going around in circles? :)
I don’t like senseless fighting.That’s what the genre asks of it.So, I don’t like the genre for that reason.
The idea of watching a film where a bunch of mindless zombies run rampage and some dumbish humans react doesn’t appeal. I like protagonists and plans.
Andy
November 7th, 2004 at 10:16 am
I think Hayko’s argument is with me. I say I like the genre but complain when it doesn’t make sense.
I like protagonists and plans and zombies.