http://atypicalreview.com/weblog/200-reviews-extravaganza-part-1 reviews and witterings on tv, film, games and the like Tue, 11 May 2010 12:01:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://atypicalreview.com/weblog/200-reviews-extravaganza-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-1084 andy Wed, 08 Mar 2006 16:51:58 +0000 http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=158#comment-1084 <p>I see the misunderstanding here. A hundred review is defined (in the respectable world of reviewers) as being worth 100 standard reviews. A standard review is worth one Jim Schembri review. So we have written 200 reviews, each of which is classified as a hundred review. There is a movement within the reviewing community to rename hundred reviews as hectoreviews</p> I see the misunderstanding here. A hundred review is defined (in the respectable world of reviewers) as being worth 100 standard reviews. A standard review is worth one Jim Schembri review. So we have written 200 reviews, each of which is classified as a hundred review. There is a movement within the reviewing community to rename hundred reviews as hectoreviews

]]> http://atypicalreview.com/weblog/200-reviews-extravaganza-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-1085 Tom Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:35:53 +0000 http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=158#comment-1085 <p>It’s little mistakes like that that evade the seasoned proofreader’s eye.</p> It’s little mistakes like that that evade the seasoned proofreader’s eye.

]]> http://atypicalreview.com/weblog/200-reviews-extravaganza-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-1086 Andrew Wed, 08 Mar 2006 12:18:02 +0000 http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=158#comment-1086 <p>200 hundred reviews? I had no idea we were so prolific.</p> 200 hundred reviews? I had no idea we were so prolific.

]]>