<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Parting of the Ways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways</link>
	<description>reviews and witterings on tv, film, games and the like</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 12:01:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1700</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, I haven&#8217;t ruined any word for anybody.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incidentally, I haven&#8217;t ruined any word for anybody.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1701</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1701</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anger can turn one into a tool of the dark side of the force. Or sometimes, just a tool. I&#8217;m surprised how much analysis season one can stand. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s super-duper literature or anything but it definitely stands some scrutiny, and ties together very well. Can&#8217;t wait for the DVDs/christmas special/next season/that teeny children in need special.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Purser-Hallard is a clever fellow. He&#8217;s written various acclaimed &lt;em&gt;Who&lt;/em&gt; spin-off books which I haven&#8217;t read. Perhaps they&#8217;ll have a &lt;em&gt;Torchwood&lt;/em&gt; range of novels that he can write for. They seem to be happy with their small group of writers for the slightly kid-friendly official &lt;em&gt;Who&lt;/em&gt; novels.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anger can turn one into a tool of the dark side of the force. Or sometimes, just a tool. I&#8217;m surprised how much analysis season one can stand. I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s super-duper literature or anything but it definitely stands some scrutiny, and ties together very well. Can&#8217;t wait for the DVDs/christmas special/next season/that teeny children in need special.</p>

<p>Purser-Hallard is a clever fellow. He&#8217;s written various acclaimed <em>Who</em> spin-off books which I haven&#8217;t read. Perhaps they&#8217;ll have a <em>Torchwood</em> range of novels that he can write for. They seem to be happy with their small group of writers for the slightly kid-friendly official <em>Who</em> novels.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1702</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1702</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good article. Subtext is great if you are pointing it out for the sake of interest or mitigate it with words like &#8220;arguably&#8221;. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Philip Purse isn&#8217;t being judgemental, he&#8217;s just putting things out there for discussion. I like him. He makes some interesting points.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lawrence Miles just pissed me off because he got so angry and used a possible interpretation to attack.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article. Subtext is great if you are pointing it out for the sake of interest or mitigate it with words like &#8220;arguably&#8221;. </p>

<p>Philip Purse isn&#8217;t being judgemental, he&#8217;s just putting things out there for discussion. I like him. He makes some interesting points.</p>

<p>Lawrence Miles just pissed me off because he got so angry and used a possible interpretation to attack.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1703</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1703</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I feel self-conscious every time I use the word &#8220;Incidentally&#8221; to start a grapefruit comment these days. I blame Jackson. He ruined the word for the rest of us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyhow: a fellow called Philip Purser-Hallard did &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;http://www.infinitarian.com/gbsodw.html&quot;&quot;&gt;a talk on &lt;em&gt;Doctor Who&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at a Christian convention recently. Obviously it&#8217;s from a Christian perspective but it&#8217;s still quite interesting. Anti-subtext people may take issue with some points&#8230;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel self-conscious every time I use the word &#8220;Incidentally&#8221; to start a grapefruit comment these days. I blame Jackson. He ruined the word for the rest of us.</p>

<p>Anyhow: a fellow called Philip Purser-Hallard did <a href=""http://www.infinitarian.com/gbsodw.html"">a talk on <em>Doctor Who</em></a> at a Christian convention recently. Obviously it&#8217;s from a Christian perspective but it&#8217;s still quite interesting. Anti-subtext people may take issue with some points&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 03:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#8217;s not nearly long enough. You didn&#8217;t get away with a &lt;a href=&quot;&quot;http://www.grapefruits.org/tv/buffy/conversationswithdeadpeople&quot;&quot;&gt;one paragraph review&lt;/a&gt;, don&#8217;t you remember?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not nearly long enough. You didn&#8217;t get away with a <a href=""http://www.grapefruits.org/tv/buffy/conversationswithdeadpeople"">one paragraph review</a>, don&#8217;t you remember?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1705</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 01:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1705</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What?  I want the entire season reviewed on Grapefuits merit badge too.  I&#8217;ll review them right here:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;701: Crap702: More Crap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There done.  The entirety of season seven.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What?  I want the entire season reviewed on Grapefuits merit badge too.  I&#8217;ll review them right here:</p>

<p>701: Crap702: More Crap.</p>

<p>There done.  The entirety of season seven.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://atypicalreview.com/tv/doctor-who/the-parting-of-the-ways/comment-page-1#comment-1706</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2005 17:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.atypicalreview.com/?p=228#comment-1706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#8217;d just like to point out that this review marks a Grapefruit record: &lt;em&gt;Doctor Who&lt;/em&gt; is the first TV show to have ever had an entire season reviewed here. Although &lt;em&gt;Buffy&lt;/em&gt; came close in season seven. And it has an advantage, only having 13 episodes and not 22.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But the point stands.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to point out that this review marks a Grapefruit record: <em>Doctor Who</em> is the first TV show to have ever had an entire season reviewed here. Although <em>Buffy</em> came close in season seven. And it has an advantage, only having 13 episodes and not 22.</p>

<p>But the point stands.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

