“tin-can production values, British parochialism… Doctor Who fans will love it.”

Did I say explain? I meant rant. Whose production values is he comparing Who to? Superman Returns? Its only rival on TV these days is Battlestar — and it’s hardly a fair competition since Battlestar gets to use the same 3D models every week and has few practical effects. “Parochialism” is clearly the moment when Britain tells the USA that something happening over British airspace is none of their business. Fantasy, yes, parochialism, no. I doubt Mr Ngyuen would call Independence Day an example of US parochialism. But he might. Gah.

The worst condemnation is that only Who fans will like it. The family hit of the decade in Britain is only palatable for fans here? That’s… harsh. I’m not saying it’s not potentially true, but it’s a brutal thing to say to a TV show.

OK, I’m done. Ah, I feel better already.

I think we have to assume that most Sycorax are either massively devoted to their ancient combat rites, or not that interested in conquering planets. I tend to agree with you and the Doctor. Besides, if all Sycorax only speak Sycoraxic then I doubt there’d be much Earth-gossip anyhow.

So somewhere between March 2006 and Christmas 2006, Harriet ran for Prime Minister, got the job, sent a probe to Mars, ushered in Britain’s Golden Age, killed the Sycorax and came under controversy about her health?

I hope they play further with the “human race as monsters” idea. I’d like to see a story where the Doctor was actually defending aliens against humans.

If ‘Rose’ was set when transmitted, in March 2005, ‘Aliens of London’ was in March 2006 and ‘The Christmas Invasion’ is therefore Christmas 2006. It’s possible that the Doctor has changed history. It always seems like he’s not allowed to interfere unless there’s alien influence — perhaps Harriet’s use of Torchwood makes the whole timeline malleable. Or something. The way RTD talks in the commentary, Harriet gets the boot. It’s not as impressive if the Doctor claims to be able to bring her down with six words and then fails to.

I agree with the Doctor in that final conversation. As he had already delivered his judgement on the Sycorax and both sides were at peace, Harriet was in the wrong. She was too slow with her death star laser. The Doctor did not seem to view their actions as seriously as Harriet did. He knew that they couldn’t kill a third of the Earth’s population so treated them more like conmen than pillaging barbarians and let them off lightly.

Is the new Doctor’s hand a fighting hand or was he just making it up? Maybe he could have got himself a fighting leg too. Perhaps when he regenerates he could immediately cut off parts of his body while he has the most energy and grow more specialised body parts like eagle eyes or a typing hand.

How long is the gap since the previous episode? The doctor previously sounded like Harriet would be in charge for a reasonable length of time, but she seems to be on the verge of losing government. Does that count as her first warning? I’d like to see her in a couple more episodes.

I agree that there should have been some kind of pain, even if they’re not allowed to show blood (and I don’t think they are). It wasn’t very dramatic at all.

The argument between Harriet and the Doctor was one of my favourite moments — they’ve both got good points. Technically Harriet’s act was unprovoked, especially when you consider that only the Sycorax Leader killed anyone, and he’s already dead. If Earth’s going to get noticed by aliens, it seems a good idea not to go around committing war crimes.